Celebrating 9 years of the hunt ban Charities and MPs mark success of Hunting Act
It is 20 years since the RSPCA, the League Against Cruel Sports and the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) began campaigning together for an end to the barbaric and outdated pastime of hunting with hounds.
That campaigning was successful with the introduction of the Hunting Act 2004, which has now been in force for nine years.
To mark the anniversary Angela a keen Animal rights supporter recently attended a reception at the House of Commons to celebrate the Act. An event hosted by fellow MP, Chris Williamson.
While there MPs where encouraged by the charities to continue to stand firm against any relaxation of the Act.
The Hunting Act prohibited the hunting of wild mammals, including foxes, deer, hares and mink with dogs, something which the vast majority of the British public opposed and continue to oppose.
The latest poll carried out by Ipsos MORI¹ at the end of 2013 shows that 80% of people in Great Britain think that fox hunting should remain illegal and 87% think that hare hunting and coursing should also remain illegal.
Since the Act came into force it quickly established itself as the most successful piece of wild animal legislation ever passed. On average one person every week is prosecuted under its provisions. Of these over two-thirds are found guilty, rendering the arguments that the ban is not enforceable, redundant.
Commenting on the event Angela said:
“In common with the majority of the British people, I believe any repeal of the Hunting Act would be a backward step for a civilized society.
“Despite scare stories at the time the ban did not affect countryside employment, cause a growth in the fox population, nor result in the loss of horses or hounds. In fact, many hunts still meet but use artificial scents to trail hunt – something which doesn’t result in the needless deaths of wild animals and is something we welcome.
However, we still need to remain alert to those who attempt to break the law making sure such acts are reported to in the same way as any other allegations of crimes against animal welfare.”
Some myths dispelled:
Myth: It’s only city dwellers who oppose hunting, if they lived in the country they’d understand
Fact: Polling consistently shows that the chasmic divide between urban and rural dwellers is pure conjecture. The 2013 survey, carried out by Ipsos MORI showed no difference in the view held by those living in rural areas versus those in urban areas on the issue of legalising fox hunting with 80% of the opinion that fox hunting should not be made legal. This is not a town versus country issue.
Myth: Hunting is essential to control the fox population
Fact: There is no scientific evidence to support the argument that hunting with dogs is necessary for controlling the fox population. The Government’s inquiry into hunting with dogs concluded: “The overall contribution of traditional fox hunting…is almost certainly insignificant in terms of the management of the fox population as a whole.”²
Myth: The Hunting Act is unenforceable
Fact: The CPS, League Against Cruel Sports and the RSPCA have prosecuted more than 280 defendants who were found guilty of offences under the Hunting Act since it came into force (an overall conviction rate of 69%³). Furthermore, the number of prosecutions under the Hunting Act compares favourably with other wildlife legislation aimed at protecting animals.
1. Ipsos MORI interviewed a representative quota sample of 1988 adults in Great Britain aged 15+.
Interviews were carried out face-to-face, in home, using CAPI (Computer Aided Personal Interviewing Laptops), as part of the Ipsos MORI Omnibus (Capibus).
Fieldwork was conducted between 1 - 7 November 2013.
The results have been weighted to reflect the known profile of the adult population.
Results are based on all respondents unless otherwise stated.
We asked the following question:
Question: Now a question about sports where animals are set on other animals to fight or kill them. These activities are currently illegal in the United Kingdom.
SHOWCARD A - For each one I read out, please tell me whether you think it should or should not be made legal again. Just read out the letter that applies in each case.
ORDER IN WHICH RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED WAS ROTATED: Fox Hunting; Deer Hunting; Hare Hunting and Coursing, Dog Fighting; Badger Baiting
Yes, should be made legal again
No, should not be made legal again
2. Burns Report, 2000
3.Hansard, 23 June 2008, Col 52W; Hansard 17 December 2008, Col 799W; Hansard, 13 January 2009, Col 713W; Hansard, 7 December 2009, Col 16W; Hansard, 4 February 2010, col 500W; Hansard, 13 September 2010, col 707-708W; Hansard, 23 November 2011, col 427-428W,;Hansard 31 October 2012,col 277-278W; Hansard, 30 October 2013, col 492-493W